Voters reject billionaire influence in key elections
Tuesday’s elections saw a surprising trend: despite massive financial investments by some of the wealthiest individuals in the country, candidates backed by billionaires faced defeat across multiple states.
In Texas, Democrat James Talarico secured victory over Republican Ken Paxton in the Senate race, despite Elon Musk reportedly investing over $200 million to support Paxton, according to a New York Times analysis. Biotech billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy lost the Ohio governor’s race to Democrat Amy Acton after contributing an estimated $36 million of his own funds. Similarly, Democrat Keisha Lance Bottoms triumphed over Republican billionaire Rick Jackson in the Georgia gubernatorial contest. Texas Governor Greg Abbott conceded to Democrat Gina Hinojosa.
“I think this might just be the biggest defeat for big money in politics in American history,” stated Logan Phillips, founder of the election forecasting site Race to the White House. He attributed the outcomes to Democrats’ ability to overcome the impact of near-unlimited spending fueled by recent Supreme Court decisions.
Musk’s spending, estimated at around $450 million, proved ineffective, with Talarico winning by a margin of 10%. Phillips noted that Musk’s investment inadvertently provided Talarico with campaign fodder, referencing an advertisement where Talarico highlighted the barrage of attack ads funded by Musk.
“You don’t want that money spent against you,” Phillips remarked, emphasizing the power of the electorate.
Ohio’s Senate race, the second most expensive in the nation with over $500 million spent, also defied expectations. Democrat Sherrod Brown defeated Republican Sen. Jon Husted by focusing on issues like AI data centers and energy costs, a strategy Phillips described as prescient.
The AI industry’s super PACs also experienced setbacks. American Mission, backed by OpenAI president Greg Brockman and Andreessen Horowitz, spent approximately $2.7 million supporting Sen. Darline Graham in South Carolina, a state overwhelmingly won by Donald Trump.
Phillips highlighted that his forecasting model prioritizes grassroots fundraising – individual donations excluding PAC money and self-funding – as a more reliable indicator of success. James Talarico emerged as the top fundraiser in the country.
While billionaire influence appeared to falter in several races, it may still prevail in California. Proposition 40, a one-time 5% tax on the state’s billionaires, was trailing 57% to 43% late Tuesday, with votes still being counted. Proposition 42, a billionaire-backed measure designed to block the tax, held a lead of approximately 55%. Wealthy California residents reportedly spent hundreds of millions to defeat Proposition 40.
Source
“‘This might just be the biggest defeat for big money in politics’: Billionaires poured hundreds of millions into Tuesday’s races and still lost”
Read the original report ↗This story is an AI-assisted version of the original report, checked and edited by the Plainwire desk before publication. Read our editorial policy · Report an error
Read next
Midterm election results spark reactions from tech and business leaders
The 2026 midterm elections delivered surprising victories for Democrats on Tuesday evening, significantly altering the balance of power in…
Related
Caught up in five lines
The Brief: the day’s biggest stories, written by our desk at and .