Cornell faculty express disapproval of university leadership

The vote follows weeks of discussion among faculty members, spurred by a lawsuit alleging mishandling of a 2024 investigation into a reported fraternity gang rape. Labor History Professor Paul Ortiz initially proposed the resolution in mid-October, characterizing the case as indicative of broader issues. The proposal garnered support from over 160 faculty members and a dozen senate members.

During a meeting on October 28, Ortiz asserted that university administrators prioritized the institution’s image over the well-being of victims, criticized the effectiveness of campus police investigations, and referenced reporting from USA TODAY highlighting Cornell’s infrequent use of suspension or expulsion for sexual assault offenses.

Some faculty members expressed reservations, arguing they lacked sufficient information to evaluate the university’s actions concerning the Doe case and other sexual assault incidents. Voting took place between October 29 and November 6.

While the Board of Trustees holds the authority to remove President Kotlikoff and other administrators, supporters hope the no-confidence vote will exert pressure, particularly given existing calls for Kotlikoff’s resignation from students and faculty groups.

In response to the allegations made by Jane Doe, Cornell commissioned a review of its sexual assault policies from former acting Attorney General Sally Yates. New York Governor Kathy Hochul, a member of the Board of Trustees, has also appointed New York Attorney General Letitia James to oversee a criminal investigation. Attorney General James has assigned Jacqueline Kelly, previously a federal prosecutor involved in the Sean Combs case, to lead the investigation.