plainwire

The news, plainly told.

Read The Brief

AI-generated advice leads to misadventures in the Wilderness

A US Forest Service official recently responded to a situation involving three young hikers who became disoriented after relying on artificial intelligence for navigation. “We get plenty of people who come unprepared or don’t do any research at all,” said Nick Meyers, US Forest Service program manager of the Mount Shasta Wilderness Climbing and Avalanche Center. “But I think they kind of turned their brains off.”

Illustration
Illustration Plainwire.

This incident is part of a growing trend. Another visitor to Mount Shasta disregarded a “No Camping” sign, claiming AI indicated she was permitted to camp there. A man was also found wandering with an inaccurate AI-generated map, showing landmarks in the wrong location.

In British Columbia, a 16-year-old hiker was rescued from a ledge on Crown Mountain after using Anthropic’s chatbot Claude to plan his trip. While the rescue gained significant attention, the teen also consulted Google Maps and AllTrails.

Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming has observed a substantial increase in visitors utilizing AI for travel planning, rising from zero to 26 percent in the past year. Park Superintendent Chip Jenkins anticipates this trend will continue.

While the long-term impact of AI use on backcountry safety remains to be seen, Meyers’ office, overseeing a large wilderness area in Northern California, typically handles around a dozen rescues annually. Wyoming has seen a decrease in search and rescue calls, with 312 in 2026 compared to 466 in 2025 and 377 in 2024.

Experts note that AI chatbots represent the latest in a series of tools that can lead people astray. A decade ago, social media platforms like Instagram contributed to similar issues, and before that, reliance on Google Maps and smartphone connectivity posed challenges.

According to Chris Flathmann, a professor at Clemson University, AI chatbots can present misinformation convincingly and foster “cognitive surrender,” where users abandon critical thinking. The technology’s ability to generate authoritative-sounding advice, even when based on unreliable sources like Reddit or outdated videos, exacerbates the problem.

Experts advise verifying information from any source, including AI, with trusted resources such as official maps, trail association websites, and guidebooks. Consulting with experienced guides, forest officials, or park rangers is also recommended. “If you’re going to go into places that will kill you,” Meyers cautioned, “you should take your planning seriously.”

Source

WiredOriginal report ·

“Chatbots Are Leading Hikers Astray, With Dangerous Consequences”

Read the original report ↗

This story is an AI-assisted version of the original report, checked and edited by the Plainwire desk before publication. Read our editorial policy · Report an error

Read next

Related

Caught up in five lines

The Brief: the day’s biggest stories, written by our desk at and .

Read The Brief
Up nextMeta’s AI boost outpaces Google’s search growth, sparking market concerns